Gates simultaneously disputes and supports portrayal of Vista requiring hardware updates

A hearty laugh followed by a short moment of pondering followed my reading of Bill Gates’ comments in the obligatory Newsweek interview upon the release of Microsoft Vista. In the interview, Bill is asked a series of questions about the inevitable comparisons between Windows Vista and Apple’s OS X operating system, and Apple’s very pointed advertisement wherein Apple implies that “PC” (played by John Hodgman) will need major surgery to run Vista.

View the video 

Newsweek: How about the implication [in the Apple ad] that you need surgery to upgrade?
Gates:Well, certainly we’ve done a better job letting you upgrade on the hardware than our competitors have done. You can choose to buy a new machine, or you can choose to do an upgrade. And I don’t know why [Apple is] acting like itâ??s superior. I don’t even get it. What are they trying to say? Does honesty matter in these things, or if you’re really cool, that means you get to be a lying person whenever you feel like it? There’s not even the slightest shred of truth to it.

What? Has Bill taken a page from that bumbling fumble mouthed President of ours? Go back and read Gates’ response aloud; it sounds like a line from a Ben Stiller movie.

Let’s break down that response to try to decode Bill’s answer.

…we’ve done a better job letting you upgrade on the hardware than our competitors have done.

Erm. Yes sir, that’s pretty much the point of the Apple spot. Microsoft’s done a commendable job (hell, a remarkable one with the release of Vista) of “letting” their customers upgrade their hardware.

Oh, wait, maybe Bill means Microsoft’s done a better job of allowing users to update their OS on their hardware. No, that can’t be what he means; during the past five years nary a single new version of Windows for the desktop was released, yet Apple introduced exactly FIVE new OS releases.

You can choose to buy a new machine, or you can choose to do an upgrade.

Uh, yeah. Yup. That’s pretty much what the ad is saying.

It seems Bill’s agreeing with the overall premise of the ad, so what’s with the overly defensive reaction?

…I don’t know why Apple is acting like it’s superior. I don’t even get it. What are they trying to say?

Well, I think Apple’s trying to say that an existing PC will need major surgery to support Vista.

There’s not even the slightest shred of truth to it.

There isn’t? Then what the hell are you talking about, Bill?

I feel like I’m taking crazy pills.

Correct technique for forcing hard drives in Mac OS X to sleep

The energy saver preference panel in Mac OS X offers a simplistic approach to managing energy saving settings, such as sleep time for the computer and disks. A user might think that by deselecting “Put the hard disk(s) to sleep when possible”, the drives would be prevented from spinning down. This is not, however, true.

Mac OS X Energy Saver preference pane

As everyone with an external FireWire, USB or internal RAID array knows, these disks will spin down after 5 minutes of being idle, regardless of whether the aforementioned check box is deselected.

What is a computer user to do when confronted by this wholly unexpected (and dare I say, ‘illogical’) situation? We’ll use Mac OS X’s UNIX underpinnings to change this behavior, using the pmset command to set all drives to never spin down (no, that’s not ecologically friendly). Continue reading

Apple iPhone set to stun!

Today Apple has announced a new multifunction quad-band GSM+EDGE hand-held phone, incorporating Wi-Fi, a wide-screen video player, with MP3 and AAC music player. It automatically senses whether it is held in portrait or landscape mode. The phone itself sports a 3.5-inch screen with 160 pixels per inch (ppi). The entire face is LCD, so all but one “home” button are in software. Apple claims the device is thinner than any other phone at 11.6 mm. (Photos included) Continue reading

New Parallels Beta 2 further integrates Windows apps into Mac OS X interface

Parallels release yesterday of a new beta (build 3094) further blurs the distinction between rival operating systems. With the new release, Windows applications appear independently in the Mac OS X dock, and even in the application switcher. Better still, Windows XP apps can be dragged to a permanent spot on the dock, and when clicked, will launch Parallels, boot Windows XP, and then launch the application. Continue reading

Belkin Debuts Wireless USB Hub

Want the freedom to place USB devices anywhere in a room? Imagine putting your scanner on a shelf behind you, your printer in a cabinet, and your camera, well, anywhere. Sick of cabling up your laptop to multiple devices? Now you can plug in a single USB “key” and connect wirelessly, at an amazing 480Mbps, to all your USB devices.

Sounds like the ultimate pitch. In many ways, it is.
Continue reading

Apple’s .Mac service: Promising features marred by spotty performance

Apple offers a suite of subscription services, collectively called .Mac (dot-mac), which offers subscribers an excellent list of features not found anywhere else [edit: Yes, most if not all features can be cobbled together on your own, but we’re talking about a cohesive suite here]. Alas, these great features come at a hefty price ($99/year from Apple, as low as $69/yr. from Amazon), and service is spotty.
Continue reading

Apple .Mac Service Interruption List

This is a list of .Mac outtages, compiled directly from Apple’s System Status, which is reported to .Mac subscribers. This list has been created by GIGOBlog’s editors in order to highlight the ongoing number of interruptions of Apple’s .Mac service.

4/12/2007
Due to scheduled maintenance, some members might not have been able to access .Mac Mail for 20 minutes or less between 10PM and 12AM PST on 04/12/2007.

04/12/2007
5% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 2 hours. Normal service has been restored.

4/11/2007
8% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 4.5 hours. Normal service has been restored.

4/7/2007
2% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 40 minutes. Normal service has been restored.

4/3/2007
3% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 10 minutes. Normal service has been restored.

03/25/2007
1.5% of members were unable to access mail using an IMAP client. Normal service has been restored.

03/19/2007
2% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 10 minutes. Normal service has been restored.

03/15/2007
2% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 1.25 hours. Normal service has been restored.

3/14/2007
0.5% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 3.5 hours. Normal service has been restored.

DATA COLLECTION ERROR: Oops, I failed to update between 2/15 and 3/14. My bad!

2/15/2007
2% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 45 minutes. Normal service has been restored.

2/10/2007
1% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 1 hour. Normal service has been restored.

2/8/2007
.Mac members were unable to access any services. Duration: 1.5 hours. Some .Mac members were unable to access mail on the web. Duration: 1.5 hours. Normal services have been restored.

2/5/2007
1% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 2 hours. Normal service has been restored.

2/5/2007
2% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 1 hour. Normal service has been restored.

2/4/2007
2% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 1 hour. Normal service has been restored.

2/4/07
Due to scheduled maintenance, some members might not have been able to access .Mac Mail for 20 minutes or less between 10pm PST on 2/3/07 and 1am PST on 2/4/07.

1/22/2007
4% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 3.5 hours. Normal service has been restored.

01/21/2007
4% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 30 minutes. Normal service has been restored.

01/16/2007
3% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 10 hours. Normal service has been restored.

01/15/2007
3% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 45 minutes.

01/11/2007
2% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 2 hours.

01/10/2007
3% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 1 hour.

01/08/2007
Email was slow for 5 hours for some .Mac Members.

01/07/2007
2% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 4 hours.

01/05/2007
4% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 48 hours.

12/25/2006
3% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 30 minutes.

12/21/2006
3% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 30 minutes.

12/20/2006
3% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 40 minutes.

12/09/2006
email was slow for 1 hour to some .Mac Members.

12/07/06
4% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 12 hours.

12/03/2006
All Services were unavailable for 2 hours to all .Mac Members.

12/01/06
4% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 1 hour.

11/22/2006
4% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 2 hours.

11/21/2006
4% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 1.5 hours.

11/18/2006
4% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 30 minutes.

11/13/2006
1% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for one hour.

11/10/2006
1% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for 2 hours.

11/09/06
1% of members experienced difficulties with .Mac Mail for one hour.

10/25/06
Some members were unable to send messages via .Mac Mail on the Web for 3 hours.